#Canon powershot g1 x mark ii dpreview series

I shoot an array of different things, but mainly landscapes. It was an amazing combo, but I found myself not taking it out due to it's size (maybe 3 times this year.). I've recently sold my Fuji X-t4 with the 16-55mm. The M system is a sorta-of point and shoot, with interchangeable lenses. Note, the size and weight differences between systems. With the compact 22mm, and even at higher ISOs, the M6 II doesn't break a sweat. The M6 Mark II, with the 11-22, is nearly a point in shoot in size. I'll toss in some non-Powershot, shots, into the mix. However, fast zoom's go counter to the argument of the M system: small, light, cheap. Those native EF-M lenses are razor sharp, small/light, but, the one Achilles heel of the M system is the lack of a fast zoom. Trust me I was looking at old photos of my own this morning from it. Also, the M6 Mark II's resolution is truly remarkable.

#Canon powershot g1 x mark ii dpreview series

The G5X II is IMO, better all around, but, the G1X III is the clear winner for landscapes, and, can easily do general photography, too.Дo you want to pocket it and / or shoot more people? G5X II.Дo you want weather sealing, a fully articulating screen, or shoot more landscape? G1X III.Д«oth? I know you just came from the X series, however, the Canon M series is quite a bit smaller and lighter than the Fuji X series.

Where I might caution you is depending on how much landscape use you do vs non-landscape use. For landscapes? The G1X III carries more resolution and a sharper lens, particularly on the wide end.